Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling

Communication Studies

Abstract: This article expands situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) to narrative persuasion. In a randomized experiment featuring a news interview of a scandalized company, an organization’s spokesperson responds to a journalist’s questions through (a) on-topic narratives, (b) off-topic (spinning) narratives, or (c) nonnarrative information. Consistent with SCCT, on-topic narratives and nonnarrative information reduce the public’s blame toward the organization, enhancing attitudes toward the organization, and ultimately bolstering the company’s image. However, the public ascribes more responsibility to the organization for causing the crisis when the spokesperson subverts questions through narrative spinning.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807378

open access: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807378?casa_token=gaQf2_fd4-EAAAAA:ImQu-hu5pbS9T281JNOHnSOuAricfR7850ZN4Brk14CLmgeKNx0PUX4PDNsvoIm2MHpe9KR4AIxWow

David Clementson 

Related Research


Exploring Differences in Crisis Literacy and Efficacy on Behavioral Responses during Infectious Disease Outbreaks

Abstract: This study examined the effects of literacy and efficacy on individuals’ protective action taking and information seeking during the early phase of infectious disease outbreaks through a nationally representative survey […]

Yan Jin
read more
Navigating Political Scandal and Reputation Crisis in Social Media

Abstract: Social media presents unique challenges and opportunities to practitioners in the public affairs context. The dominant social media platforms allow organizations to communicate directly with voters, supporters, and customers, […]

Joseph Watson
read more