Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling
Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling
Abstract: This article expands situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) to narrative persuasion. In a randomized experiment featuring a news interview of a scandalized company, an organization’s spokesperson responds to a journalist’s questions through (a) on-topic narratives, (b) off-topic (spinning) narratives, or (c) nonnarrative information. Consistent with SCCT, on-topic narratives and nonnarrative information reduce the public’s blame toward the organization, enhancing attitudes toward the organization, and ultimately bolstering the company’s image. However, the public ascribes more responsibility to the organization for causing the crisis when the spokesperson subverts questions through narrative spinning.
Related Research
-
Distinguishing Moral Outrage and Empathetic Anger: Advancing the Triadic Appraisal Framework of Situational Crisis Communication TheoryRongting Niu (Ph.D. candidate), Nicholas Eng, and Yan Jin. (Forthcoming). “Distinguishing Moral Outrage and Empathetic Anger: Advancing the Triadic Appraisal Framework of Situational Crisis Communication Theory.” Journal of Public Relations Research. Abstract: […]
-
Corporate social advocacy (CSA) and crisis communication: Examining the effectiveness of crisis responses to backlashRuoyo Sun (2026). “Corporate social advocacy (CSA) and crisis communication: Examining the effectiveness of crisis responses to backlash,” In Y. Lee, J. Y. Li, & W. Tao (Eds.), Strategic communication […]