Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling

Communication Studies

Abstract: This article expands situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) to narrative persuasion. In a randomized experiment featuring a news interview of a scandalized company, an organization’s spokesperson responds to a journalist’s questions through (a) on-topic narratives, (b) off-topic (spinning) narratives, or (c) nonnarrative information. Consistent with SCCT, on-topic narratives and nonnarrative information reduce the public’s blame toward the organization, enhancing attitudes toward the organization, and ultimately bolstering the company’s image. However, the public ascribes more responsibility to the organization for causing the crisis when the spokesperson subverts questions through narrative spinning.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807378

open access: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807378?casa_token=gaQf2_fd4-EAAAAA:ImQu-hu5pbS9T281JNOHnSOuAricfR7850ZN4Brk14CLmgeKNx0PUX4PDNsvoIm2MHpe9KR4AIxWow

David Clementson 

Related Research


The Best of Both Worlds: The Crisis Communication Think Tank (CCTT) Approach to The Quest for Crisis Management Keystone

Yan Jin. (forthcoming), “The Best of Both Worlds: The Crisis Communication Think Tank (CCTT) Approach to The Quest for Crisis Management Keystone,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. Abstract: This […]

Yan Jin
read more
Viewing violent policing videos contributes to trauma outcomes beyond experiences with police: A minority health perspective approach

Glenna L. Read, Yan, H, & Bailey, R. “Viewing violent policing videos contributes to trauma outcomes beyond experiences with police: A minority health perspective approach,” paper to be presented at […]

Glenna Read
read more