How Do Individuals With Conspiracy Beliefs Respond to Humorous Public Service Announcements Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination? The Role of Scientific Consensus and Vaccine Confidence
How Do Individuals With Conspiracy Beliefs Respond to Humorous Public Service Announcements Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination? The Role of Scientific Consensus and Vaccine Confidence
Han, J. Y., Kim, H. (Grady Alum), Yoon, H. J., & Seo, J. K. “How Do Individuals With Conspiracy Beliefs Respond to Humorous Public Service Announcements Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination? The Role of Scientific Consensus and Vaccine Confidence.” Forthcoming at International Journal of Communication.
Abstract: Individuals with higher COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs tend to distrust vaccine initiatives and counterargue the actions of the government or scientific experts. Still, there has been limited research on the messaging strategies that effectively promote these individuals' COVID-19 vaccine confidence and vaccination intention. Guided by humor theories, this study investigates the impact of humorous public service advertisements (PSAs) containing scientific consensus information about the necessity of COVID-19 vaccination. The findings suggested that people holding moderate or strong (vs. weak) beliefs in conspiracy theories were more likely to have confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine when humor was used in messages that didn't include scientific consensus information endorsed by experts. This increased vaccine confidence also led to a higher intention of getting vaccinated. However, when the scientific consensus was present in the message, humor exhibited a significant and negative impact on vaccine confidence for individuals with high conspiracy beliefs, which lowered their vaccination intention.
Related Research
-
Bahamas International Film FestivalNate Kohn attended the Bahamas International Film Festival, November 13-17, at Baha-Mar in Nassau. He was a judge of the feature length narrative and documentary films competitions. He was also a […]
-
Ethical considerations in the integration of AI and Biometric ToolsGlenna L. Read (to be presented 2025). “Ethical considerations in the integration of AI and Biometric Tools,” as part of Wu, L., Read, G. L., Holiday, S. Wen, T., Wilson, J., […]