If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter
If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter
Itai Himelboim, Borah, P., Lorenzano, K., Lee, J.J. & Cao, X. “If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter” manuscripts accepted for publication in the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Abstract: The use of emotional appeals in political conversations can be an effective strategy to trigger short-term engagement but also result in detrimental societal outcomes as alienation, polarization, and extremism. Whereas scholars examined different individual types of emotional appeals, this study proposes a multifaced approach to understanding emotional appeals. It applies computational methods to extract tone, discrete emotions and topic modeling to extract topics later classified into appraisal types. Findings show that whereas users primarily posted content that was negative in tone, angry in emotion, and critical in appraisal, Twitter users engaged more with positive, joyful, supportive, or just neutral content.
Related Research
-
Glen Nowak was an invited panelist for a University Research Magazine Association (URMA)Glen Nowak was an invited panelist for a University Research Magazine Association (URMA) online “URMA Live” webinar on “Garnering trust on tough topics” on February 18. He was one of three […]
-
United Press Associations: Collective Action for Local News Outlets?Karin Assman, “United Press Associations: Collective Action for Local News Outlets?” accepted for presentation (and organization) at the 2026 Local Journalism Researchers Workshop this April in Washington, D.C. Overview: This presentation […]