How web comments affect perceptions of political interviews and journalistic control.

Political Psychology, 40, 815-836. doi:10.1111/pops.12560

Abstract: People are often exposed to polarized viewpoints in web comment sections. Inspired by attribution theory and framing theory, this article tests the effects of comments that frame a politician or a journalist as triggering evasiveness in a media interview. We compare attributions ascribing deceptiveness to the politician versus external attributions implicating the media situation. In the first experiment, comment sections affect perceptions of evasiveness, credibility of the politician relative to the journalist, and people’s attitudes toward the politician and journalist. A second study replicates, and voters type comments which largely reflect the comments to which they were exposed. Also, perceptions of external control by the journalist affect perceptions of the politician. The article extends attribution theory and framing theory via commonly encountered online exposure which affects people’s perceptions of politicians as deceptive relative to their journalistic arbiters.

David Clementson 

Related Research


Fact or Fiction: Empowering News Literacy as a Leadership Skill

Keith Herndon, Kate Hester (current M.A. student) and Charlotte Norsworthy (2023). “Fact or Fiction: Empowering News Literacy as a Leadership Skill.” Paper to be presented at the Association of Leadership […]

Keith Herndon
read more
Covering Climate Solutions with Journalism

Kyser Lough, Amanda Bright, Ralitsa Vassileva & Chapman, A. (undergraduate student) (May 17, 2023). “Covering Climate Solutions with Journalism,” session proposal accepted for presentation at the Georgia Climate Conference, Athens, […]

Kyser LoughAmanda BrightRalitsa Vassileva
read more