Are deceitful politicians impervious to scrutiny? A test of voters’ truth-default
Are deceitful politicians impervious to scrutiny? A test of voters’ truth-default
Abstract: Truth-default theory (TDT) holds that people tend to passively believe others without consciously considering whether they are being told the truth. But do voters have a truth-default toward politicians? In an experiment, voters across the U.S. (N = 294) watched a news interview in which a politician was either honest or deceptive. Party affiliation was also manipulated. Consistent with TDT, thought-listing tasks revealed that most voters did not mention deception after exposure to the campaign interview. Voters largely defaulted to the truth even when sustaining outgroup partisan exposure and deception, and when asked about the politician’s demeanor. Filling out closed-ended scales, though, voters reported distrust, suspicion, and perceiving deceptive messaging. Discussion concerns implications of voters’ perceptions of a politician’s veracity varying based on how voters are prompted.
Related Research
-
The Boundaries of Intersectional Journalism Studies: Gender, Migration Biography and East/West German SocializationKarin Assmann and Eckert, S. “The Boundaries of Intersectional Journalism Studies: Gender, Migration Biography and East/West German Socialization,” paper presented at the Journalism Studies Division Conference of the German Communication Association; […]
-
Big Butt Ideology’: Digital gaze and evolving normative beauty constructs for Black womenQuindelda “Q.” McElroy (Ph.D. student) (Accepted). “‘Big Butt Ideology’: Digital gaze and evolving normative beauty constructs for Black women.” Howard Journal of Communications. DOI: 10.1080/10646175.2025.2567330 Abstract: By applying methods of ideological […]