Are deceitful politicians impervious to scrutiny? A test of voters’ truth-default
Are deceitful politicians impervious to scrutiny? A test of voters’ truth-default
Abstract: Truth-default theory (TDT) holds that people tend to passively believe others without consciously considering whether they are being told the truth. But do voters have a truth-default toward politicians? In an experiment, voters across the U.S. (N = 294) watched a news interview in which a politician was either honest or deceptive. Party affiliation was also manipulated. Consistent with TDT, thought-listing tasks revealed that most voters did not mention deception after exposure to the campaign interview. Voters largely defaulted to the truth even when sustaining outgroup partisan exposure and deception, and when asked about the politician’s demeanor. Filling out closed-ended scales, though, voters reported distrust, suspicion, and perceiving deceptive messaging. Discussion concerns implications of voters’ perceptions of a politician’s veracity varying based on how voters are prompted.
Related Research
-
Intersectional Political Economy: New Directions for Research and TeachingKarin Assmann will be a panelist on an International Communication Association pre-conference panel titled “Intersectional Political Economy: New Directions for Research and Teaching.” This research panel session focuses on “How can […]
-
‘AI Sometimes Lack Cultural Reality’: Trust, Verification, and Constraint in Nigerian NewsroomsAmaka P. Onebunne and Moses U. Okocha (Ph.D. student), “‘AI Sometimes Lack Cultural Reality’: Trust, Verification, and Constraint in Nigerian Newsrooms,” paper to be presented at the 51st AEJMC Southeast […]