What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
Abstract: U.S. presidential candidates aspire to be perceived as "presidential." Political communication researchers, political scientists, pollsters, campaign consultants, and media pundits speculate about who is "presidential" and "unpresidential." No prior research, however, has empirically measured and validated a presidential image construct. Based on data collected prior to the 2020 U.S. presidential election (N = 618 registered likely voters), we tested congeneric models of presidentiality. Results indicated (1) a six-item, single-factor model fit well when single group confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed separately on ratings of Donald Trump (Study 1) and Joe Biden (Study 2), (2) multiple-group CFA indicated configural and metric invariance (generalizability across candidates) of the model, and (3) presidential factor scores were strongly associated with the candidate participants planned to vote for in the election. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Related Research
-
Glen Nowak was an invited panelist for a University Research Magazine Association (URMA)Glen Nowak was an invited panelist for a University Research Magazine Association (URMA) online “URMA Live” webinar on “Garnering trust on tough topics” on February 18. He was one of three […]
-
United Press Associations: Collective Action for Local News Outlets?Karin Assman, “United Press Associations: Collective Action for Local News Outlets?” accepted for presentation (and organization) at the 2026 Local Journalism Researchers Workshop this April in Washington, D.C. Overview: This presentation […]