What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
Abstract: U.S. presidential candidates aspire to be perceived as "presidential." Political communication researchers, political scientists, pollsters, campaign consultants, and media pundits speculate about who is "presidential" and "unpresidential." No prior research, however, has empirically measured and validated a presidential image construct. Based on data collected prior to the 2020 U.S. presidential election (N = 618 registered likely voters), we tested congeneric models of presidentiality. Results indicated (1) a six-item, single-factor model fit well when single group confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed separately on ratings of Donald Trump (Study 1) and Joe Biden (Study 2), (2) multiple-group CFA indicated configural and metric invariance (generalizability across candidates) of the model, and (3) presidential factor scores were strongly associated with the candidate participants planned to vote for in the election. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Related Research
-
Nobody Want to Be Here, Nobody Wants to LeaveProduced by Nate Kohn, Caleb Samples, Cash Robinson and Feike Santbergen, directed by UGA low residency MFA student Cash Robinson and written by MFA graduate Caleb Samples, “Nobody Want to […]
-
Spotlight on TurkeyCarolina Acosta-Alzuru presented on“Spotlight on Turkey” at C21 Content Americas, the largest TV content market focusing on the Americas. Miami, January 25, 2024 Abstract: The presentation focused on three main questions. […]