Unintended consequences of spatial presence on learning in virtual reality
Unintended consequences of spatial presence on learning in virtual reality
Sun Joo (Grace) Ahn, Kristine Nowak & Jeremy Bailenson (2022). “Unintended consequences of spatial presence on learning in virtual reality.” Computers & Education, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104532
Abstract: Research on virtual reality (VR) in education and training has found that spatial presence, the perception that the body is inside a mediated environment, increases engagement. However, experiencing spatial presence requires the allocation of limited processing resources, potentially inhibiting the processing of other information. Guided by the frameworks of Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing (LC4MP), and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, two experiments examined the effects of different modalities on spatial presence to test the prediction that spatial presence negatively impacts recall. Study 1 (N = 100) found that VR elicited higher spatial presence than video, but that high spatial presence reduced recall. Individual differences (technology apprehension) moderated spatial presence. Study 2 (N = 260) found that pre-existing interest in the learning content and aversive responses elicited by the learning content increased spatial presence. However, segmenting the VR content to reduce processing load for participants had little effect on spatial presence or information recall. In sum, modality features and individual differences drove user experiences of spatial presence, which negatively impacted recall, but segmentation of VR content had no effect on learning outcomes.
Related Research
-
Bahamas International Film FestivalNate Kohn attended the Bahamas International Film Festival, November 13-17, at Baha-Mar in Nassau. He was a judge of the feature length narrative and documentary films competitions. He was also a […]
-
Ethical considerations in the integration of AI and Biometric ToolsGlenna L. Read (to be presented 2025). “Ethical considerations in the integration of AI and Biometric Tools,” as part of Wu, L., Read, G. L., Holiday, S. Wen, T., Wilson, J., […]