Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in Communication
Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in Communication
Abstract: The open science (OS) movement has advocated for increased transparency in certain aspects of research. Communication is taking its first steps towards OS as some journals have adopted OS guidelines codified by another discipline. We find this pursuit troubling as OS prioritizes openness while insufficiently addressing essential ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Some recommended open science practices (OSPs) increase the potential for harm for marginalized participants, communities, and researchers. We elaborate how OS can serve a marginalizing force within academia and the research community, as it overlooks the needs of marginalized scholars and excludes some forms of scholarship. We challenge the current instantiation of OS and propose a divergent agenda for the future of Communication research centered on ethical, inclusive research practices.
Related Research
-
Harmonization of Policies, Digital Infrastructure, and the South Korean Media Industry in the Age of Artificial IntelligenceBenjamin Han received a $10,000 grant for his project “Harmonization of Policies, Digital Infrastructure, and the South Korean Media Industry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” from the Carsey-Wolf Center (CWC) […]
-
Thinking Out Loud about Telenovelas/ Pensando en voz alta sobre las telenovelasCarolina Acosta-Alzuru (2025, May) was an invited participant on “Thinking Out Loud about Telenovelas/ Pensando en voz alta sobre las telenovelas,” Scholars Convening: Telenovela. Americas Society/Council of the Americas. New York, NY. The […]