How partisan voters detect deception in polarizing political media
How partisan voters detect deception in polarizing political media
Abstract: The public considers politicians to be deceptive. Empirical research, however, indicates voters fail to notice deception from politicians in practice. An experiment was run in which U.S. voters (n = 133 Democrats, n = 138 Republicans) watched a partisan news interview featuring a senator. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: a Fox News interviewer accusing (or not accusing) a Democrat of deception, or a CNN interviewer accusing (or not accusing) a Republican of deception. Consistent with truth-default theory (TDT), voters distrusted a politician through elevated suspicion toward the politician, followed by perceiving deceptive messaging. Also in line with TDT, in-group/out-group bias drove perceptions of deception. However, moderated multiple mediator modeling indicated voters reacted the same regardless of whether the media accused the politician of deception.
Related Research
-
Intersectional Political Economy: New Directions for Research and TeachingKarin Assmann will be a panelist on an International Communication Association pre-conference panel titled “Intersectional Political Economy: New Directions for Research and Teaching.” This research panel session focuses on “How can […]
-
‘AI Sometimes Lack Cultural Reality’: Trust, Verification, and Constraint in Nigerian NewsroomsAmaka P. Onebunne and Moses U. Okocha (Ph.D. student), “‘AI Sometimes Lack Cultural Reality’: Trust, Verification, and Constraint in Nigerian Newsrooms,” paper to be presented at the 51st AEJMC Southeast […]