What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
What does it mean to be “presidential”? A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the invariance of indicators in a unidimensional scale
Abstract: U.S. presidential candidates aspire to be perceived as "presidential." Political communication researchers, political scientists, pollsters, campaign consultants, and media pundits speculate about who is "presidential" and "unpresidential." No prior research, however, has empirically measured and validated a presidential image construct. Based on data collected prior to the 2020 U.S. presidential election (N = 618 registered likely voters), we tested congeneric models of presidentiality. Results indicated (1) a six-item, single-factor model fit well when single group confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed separately on ratings of Donald Trump (Study 1) and Joe Biden (Study 2), (2) multiple-group CFA indicated configural and metric invariance (generalizability across candidates) of the model, and (3) presidential factor scores were strongly associated with the candidate participants planned to vote for in the election. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Related Research
-
Go Abroad: Cultural Exchange Programs for Journalism StudentsRoberta Fiorito (Ph.D. student) and Kyser Lough have been invited to participate in a panel titled “Go Abroad: Cultural Exchange Programs for Journalism Students” at AEJMC 2026 in New Orleans. The teaching panel […]
-
Anatomy of Governance: An Inquiry into the Hidden Foundation of Crisis ManagementYan Jin (Chair). “Anatomy of Governance: An Inquiry into the Hidden Foundation of Crisis Management.” Accepted for Panel Session at BledCom (The 33rd International Public Relations Research Symposium), June 26-27, 2026, […]