Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling
Narratives as viable crisis response strategies: Attribution of crisis responsibility, organizational attitudes, reputation, and storytelling
Abstract: This article expands situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) to narrative persuasion. In a randomized experiment featuring a news interview of a scandalized company, an organization’s spokesperson responds to a journalist’s questions through (a) on-topic narratives, (b) off-topic (spinning) narratives, or (c) nonnarrative information. Consistent with SCCT, on-topic narratives and nonnarrative information reduce the public’s blame toward the organization, enhancing attitudes toward the organization, and ultimately bolstering the company’s image. However, the public ascribes more responsibility to the organization for causing the crisis when the spokesperson subverts questions through narrative spinning.
Related Research
-
Punish or Forgive? Exploring the Mediating Role of Perceived CEO Attitude on the Interaction of Emotional Crisis Communication and Crisis TypeJames Ndone, Qi Zheng, Rongting Niu (PhD student), Yan Jin, Margaret Duffy. (2026). “Punish or Forgive? Exploring the Mediating Role of Perceived CEO Attitude on the Interaction of Emotional Crisis […]
-
Health Persuasion Enablers and Barriers, Intertwined: Uncovering the Roles of Trust, Risk Tolerance and Message Fatigue among Australian AdultsHyoyeun Jun (PhD alum), Amisha Mehta, Youngji Seo (PhD alum), Yan Jin, and Jacob Riley. (2025). “Health Persuasion Enablers and Barriers, Intertwined: Uncovering the Roles of Trust, Risk Tolerance and Message Fatigue […]