Judging photojournalism: The metajournalistic discourse of judges in two photojournalism competitions
Judging photojournalism: The metajournalistic discourse of judges in two photojournalism competitions
Abstract: This study investigates how discussions during photojournalism award judging can be used as metajournalistic discourse to gain insight about the definition, boundaries and legitimization of the field. Photojournalism awards shape the field by showing what is valued, but the process of judging can also provide insight. The author carries this out through discourse analysis of publicly-available video of judging rounds from two photojournalism competitions, Best of Photojournalism (BOP) and Pictures of the Year International (POYi).
Related Research
-
’We earned it, we earned capital through what we do’: Black Broadcast Journalists’ Changing Online and Offline NormsDenetra Walker. “’We earned it, we earned capital through what we do’: Black Broadcast Journalists’ Changing Online and Offline Norms,” presented at Broadcast and Mobile Journalism Division at the 2026 […]
-
I Came to Tallahassee a Stranger. I Left Calling It HomeMoni Basu, “I Came to Tallahassee a Stranger. I Left Calling It Home,” a reported essay about Indian immigrants in the South in the 1970s published in Flamingo Magazine, July […]