Judging photojournalism: The metajournalistic discourse of judges in two photojournalism competitions
Judging photojournalism: The metajournalistic discourse of judges in two photojournalism competitions
Abstract: This study investigates how discussions during photojournalism award judging can be used as metajournalistic discourse to gain insight about the definition, boundaries and legitimization of the field. Photojournalism awards shape the field by showing what is valued, but the process of judging can also provide insight. The author carries this out through discourse analysis of publicly-available video of judging rounds from two photojournalism competitions, Best of Photojournalism (BOP) and Pictures of the Year International (POYi).
Related Research
-
Catfishing, Clickbait & Single Mothers: Representation of Women Journalists in Peacock SeriesThe PaperRoberta Fiorito (Ph.D. student), “Catfishing, Clickbait & Single Mothers: Representation of Women Journalists in Peacock SeriesThe Paper,” accepted for presentation to Pop Culture Association (PCA) conference in April 8, 2026, Atlanta. Abstract: […]
-
The Boundaries of Intersectional Journalism Studies: Gender, Migration Biography and East/West German SocializationKarin Assmann and Eckert, S. “The Boundaries of Intersectional Journalism Studies: Gender, Migration Biography and East/West German Socialization,” paper presented at the Journalism Studies Division Conference of the German Communication Association; […]