Scrolling for the truth (or not): Perceptions of misinformation on TikTok and potential interventions
Scrolling for the truth (or not): Perceptions of misinformation on TikTok and potential interventions
Brittany Shivers (PhD Student) and Bartosz Wojdynski. “Scrolling for the truth (or not): Perceptions of misinformation on TikTok and potential interventions.” Accepted for presentation at the 49th annual AEJMC Southeast Colloquium regional conference, March 7-9, 2024, Lexington, KY.
Abstract: Two experiments examined users’ perceptions of message credibility, source quality, and news source trust of true or false TikTok videos about monkeypox. Study 1 tested the impact of information type (true vs. false) and source (journalist vs. influencer) on users’ perceptions of TikTok videos with party identification as a moderator. Participants rated message credibility and source quality higher for true videos and videos with a journalistic source. Study 2 tested the efficacy of three potential misinformation interventions through psychological reactance with the banner label having a positive effect on reactance and the PSA pre-roll video having a negative main effect on perceived message credibility of the TikTok misinformation video. Reactance itself had a negative effect on perceived message credibility and source quality. In both studies, participants had difficulty discerning between true and false claims.
Related Research
-
Nobody Wants to Be Here, Nobody Wants to LeaveNate Kohn had a feature-length film he co-produced – “Nobody Wants to Be Here, Nobody Wants to Leave” – as the closing night film at the Saimaa Film Festival in […]
-
Companions, Faces, and Creative Content in the Age of AI AdvertisingHye Jin Yoon was on an online panel titled “Companions, Faces, and Creative Content in the Age of AI Advertising,” hosted by the Journal of Advertising Research.