If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter
If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter
Itai Himelboim, Borah, P., Lorenzano, K., Lee, J.J. & Cao, X. “If It Bleeds, It Doesn’t Lead: Emotional Appeals and Engagement in Immigration and Election Conversations on Twitter” manuscripts accepted for publication in the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Abstract: The use of emotional appeals in political conversations can be an effective strategy to trigger short-term engagement but also result in detrimental societal outcomes as alienation, polarization, and extremism. Whereas scholars examined different individual types of emotional appeals, this study proposes a multifaced approach to understanding emotional appeals. It applies computational methods to extract tone, discrete emotions and topic modeling to extract topics later classified into appraisal types. Findings show that whereas users primarily posted content that was negative in tone, angry in emotion, and critical in appraisal, Twitter users engaged more with positive, joyful, supportive, or just neutral content.
Related Research
-
Harmonization of Policies, Digital Infrastructure, and the South Korean Media Industry in the Age of Artificial IntelligenceBenjamin Han received a $10,000 grant for his project “Harmonization of Policies, Digital Infrastructure, and the South Korean Media Industry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” from the Carsey-Wolf Center (CWC) […]
-
Thinking Out Loud about Telenovelas/ Pensando en voz alta sobre las telenovelasCarolina Acosta-Alzuru (2025, May) was an invited participant on “Thinking Out Loud about Telenovelas/ Pensando en voz alta sobre las telenovelas,” Scholars Convening: Telenovela. Americas Society/Council of the Americas. New York, NY. The […]